Watching Tv Clipart

Selected Clipart:

MacRumors

Mar 29, 08:33 AM

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/03/29/amazon-launches-cloud-based-storage-service-and-music-player/)


http://images.macrumors.com/article/2011/03/29/091605-amazon_cloud_drive.jpg

A Man or Boy Watching TV and

McGiord

Apr 10, 08:12 AM

gnasher729:
You were not allowed to vote twice.
So you voted for?

:D

---

Selected Clipart:

biggarthomas

Nov 23, 07:30 AM

A friend of mine heard from someone who works at Rim that they and Apple are working on a phone! If I thoght that this news would do anything to Apple or Rim stock, I would not be telling you. I already own Apple and cannot see Rim's advancing any more than a few points on the news.

---

While Watching TV Clipart

asdf542

Mar 31, 08:58 AM

Wow, the level of arrogance and lack of respect on MacRumors never ceases to amaze me. Every thread, and I mean every, turns into a free for all of personal attacks and insults. Interesting that I never once insulted or disrespected any one individual, yet two responses attempt to personally attack me. Do you know me? Why is this a personal matter for you?

This is about opinions and civil discourse, not about trying to prove how smart you are or to put someone "in their place". That says more about you than me.

Last time I will address this matter unless you wish to discuss the topic without rolling eyes, assumptions on my intelligence, and overly dramatic misinterpretations on my comments (that had NOTHING to do with you - and this relates more so for the first comment quoted).

/end
Lol...

So where exactly did I personally insult you?

---

Around Watching TV Clipart

Mike Oxard

Mar 29, 09:24 AM

For $1000 you would go a long way to getting a mac mini with a 1TB drive and get it hosted at macminicolo (http://www.macminicolo.net/). Send them a secod hand mini and it'd be cheaper. Not sure how nice the experience would be streaming stuff to your phone over 3G though :o

---

TV Watch Soccer Online

mscriv

May 3, 01:44 PM

Awaiting confirmation from mscriv. In the meanwhile, one slot is still open.

Ok, I'm in. Now where did I put those....


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRmHh4sTAvx49pmmr5IYddZOPj92x-0Z4zTW1mLDtuWSLoj7s8whTMf9E9n

And just so we're all clear, I'm definitely Chaotic Good. :D

---

watch tv clip art

waloshin

Apr 11, 03:25 AM

The answer is 288.

Anyone with a decent education is taught B.E.D.M.A.S not PEDMAS.

Brackets.Exponents. Division.Addition/Subtraction in that order!

/End thread.

---

Cartoon Tv clip art

kdarling

Apr 20, 09:31 AM

Faster or lower power CPU = hopefully something more cpu hungry in the OS.

Widgets would be nice.

Whatever the new feature is, we already know from history that it probably won't be allowed to run on older models, even if they do get the token OS version upgrade.

---

Watching Tv Clipart #93113 by

pmz

Mar 28, 11:16 AM

Capacity bump now, full update September(ish)?

Now in what way would that possibly make sense? Are you being serious or just plucking out of thin air?

---

Pj#39;s Watching TV Clipart

GGJstudios

Jan 12, 10:42 AM

I'yes I'm a Mac user, and yes it has detected files with problems.
What kind of problems, exactly? Windows malware? Mac malware?

---

Watching Tv Clipart #438036 by

belsokar

Apr 26, 02:37 PM

You'll care when the majority of developers will jump to Android because it has more users. Why do you think most people still use Windows? Because it has more software. Once you get behind, it's tough to keep up. Look at Windows Phone 7. They have to pull really hard to get some developers to build apps for them.

I have to say I'm impressed how Google managed to get this off the ground so fast. Microsoft is still struggling, and they have a pool of traditional .Net developers behind them to potentially build apps for their mobile platform.

As an iOS developer, with both a Java and .Net background, I can say that right now, all the money to be made is primarily in the iOS camp. Android users DO NOT BUY apps. That is a generalization, but it is a TRUE generalization. They do not buy apps like iPhone users. There are many reasons for that. One is that many Android users got free or really cheap phones, and don't tend to come from higher income backgrounds. They are less likely to spend money than iPhone users. Moreover, the infrastructure for buying apps is not setup as well as iPhone. All iPhone users can buy apps the second they are setup, that is not true for Android users.

In terms of monetizing free Android apps...they do not pay well when it comes to Ad revenue. For a client's app I released on an iPhone, using iAds, I needed 10,000 daily users at about 1 minute of use time per user per day to make about $5K/month in Ad revenue. In order to get that kind of revenue on a free Android app, I would need approximately 200,000 daily users. That is a huge discrepancy between ecosystems,...it is not easy to get 10,000 daily users, much less 200,000,...meaning developers are going to stick with iOS as long as it pays better.

So for the time being, I don't concern myself with Android as a developer. Now if google finds a way to make Android phones just as profitable as iPhones, or develops an ecosystem much like Apple's that drives app purchases and app revenue to something resembling, or outpacing Apple, then I would be REALLY worried as an iPhone developer and user. I just don't see it happening as Google is more concerned with it's own Ad business, and how to make Google more money, rather than spending more time and effort on how to best make developers money. Apple has struck a great balance that allows them to keep developers happy while continuing to reap the rewards in terms of company profits.

---

Essay Clipart 011511

Eldiablojoe

May 3, 10:46 PM

I'm going to vote YES for Don't Panic, but NO for splitting up.

Beatrice, Should we reveal that we are telepathic, or should we save that tidbit for when it is most needed?

---

Selected Clipart:

G4scott

Aug 11, 10:02 AM

Hopefully they'll release the MacBook pros before Sept. 16 so I can still get my free iPod nano, but knowing Apple, they always wait until the end if their major promotion to introduce new stuff... Perhaps they'll update the MBP before then and the iPods after the 16th. I don't really need the latest iPod out there.

I'm holding off for the new MBP because from what I've seen, the current ones still have issues. It was Apple's first Mac to go to Intel, and although they've made some changes, it's still "first generation". I'm hoping the next revision will have more than just a processor upgrade.

That said, I don't see the MacBooks going with the Core 2 Duo until sometime next year. The Core Duo is a fine chip, and will handle pretty much anything a MacBook owner would need, and it would make the more expensive MacBook Pro seem more appealing.

---

Elephant Watching TV and

VanMac

Apr 26, 02:09 PM

Competition is good :) Keeps Apple on their toes

Don't need another MS Monopoly.......

---

Lazy Dino Drinking a Beer and

jettredmont

Apr 5, 03:44 PM

The only thing uglier than a Scion is a Scion iPhone theme.

Yes, that is one butt-ugly screen.

I have to say I'm not sure Toyota isn't just saying Apple made them pull this after someone with a modicum of design sense looked at it and noticed it is uglier than an Edsel/Gremlin/Aztek 3-way love child that should have been smothered at birth.

From Apple's perspective, such a skin devalues the iPhone brand, pure and simple. Go to Android if you want freedom to be as tasteless as you want.

---

While Watching TV Clipart

twoodcc

Aug 4, 05:20 PM

..and in the case of x86-64 (Intel and AMD) the 64 bit mode of operation allows the CPU to expose more registers for use at compile time (and few other improvements). This can improve optimizations that the compiler can make which can improve the performance of the application it builds.

Also the ability to do integer math using 64 bit wide registers with 64 bit wide functional unit can be a decent performance win for several types of tasks.

yeah, what he said :p i knew someone would back me up

---

illustration - Watching TV

leman

May 6, 01:58 AM

If ARM is indeed able to make high-performance CPUs, then a move like this would be one of the most significant ones in the computing history. Let's face it: the x86 architecture is a dead end. Its needlessly complicated and builds on obsolete tech. Internally, the modern x86 CPUs aren't even x86 anymore - they decompose, recompile and reorder the machine code as they execute it. The ARM assembly is more suited for modern computing as it is more efficient as the x86 code and allows better CPU pipeline utilization.

The real question is whether ARM is able to create a CPU which is powerful enough to compete with Intel's offerings. The x86 may be inefficient but the sophisticated design of Intel CPUs results in great performance. ARM must really step on it to attain these levels.

P.S. If something like this should happen, I am sure that ARM will include hardware emulation layer for x86 instructions, for compatibility with older software. Any anyway, what does it cost to recompile an application? Indeed: nothing (if the application is competently written, that is).

---

Glossy Tv clip art. Preview

Popeye206

Apr 25, 10:33 AM

There's a black Escalade parked outside with a guy in a suit and sunglasses. I think there's an Apple sticker on the rear window? :eek:

Someone, please call Jesse Ventura! Help!
:rolleyes:

---

Tv clip art

doodosh

Sep 16, 04:36 PM

Looks like Kamino (http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/15249612/)

great. thank you

---

JackSYi

Jul 21, 02:17 PM

I really should of waited. *sigh

---

bradc

Aug 7, 03:15 PM

Just ordered my Mac Pro!! :D

Quad 3Ghz, 4GB ram, 250GB HD + 500 GB HD, X1900 XT 512MB, Bluetooth+Airport, wireless keyboard and mouse, 1 Superdrive (holding out for BluRay) 30" ACD... $8264.23 :eek:
Estimated Ship Time... 3- 5 Weeks :eek: :eek:

This is gonna be good.


I went Quad 3Ghz, 1GB Ram, 160GB HD, X1900XT, Bluetooth and Fibre-Channel, 2-Superdrives. Then I'll buy more RAM and a bigger hd when it gets here. I am sooooooooo pumped!

---

citizenzen

Apr 16, 01:23 PM

It's spending on investment rather than spending on consumption.

This is a key point to the growing inequity of wealth in America. The rich have surplus funds that they are able to invest, while the poor, and a growing number of people are spending all of the income on consumption.


In 2007 Zhu Xiao Di wrote a report for the Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies title, Growing Wealth, Inequity, and Housing in the United States [PDF] (http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/publications/markets/w07-1.pdf)

Abstract

The rapid growth of household wealth in the United States has been accompanied by drastic growing inequality. This paper discusses both wealth and inequality growth, examines demographic factors behind the growth, and analyzes housing�s role in it, using the Survey of Consumer Finances data collected by the Federal Reserve Bank. While aggregate household net wealth grew from $25.9 trillion in 1995 to $50.1 trillion in 2004 (both in 2004 dollars), nearly 90 percent of the net gains occurred only among the top quartile of households in the wealth distribution. Although housing wealth (both home equity and housing value) was still more evenly distributed than other types of wealth, it largely served to widen the wealth gap rather than to narrow it during the last decade.



In this report, he clearly illustrates the difference between household net wealth and household income.


Wealth Inequality and Household Net Wealth Growth

It is well known that the distribution of household net wealth is even more unbalanced than that of household income. Net wealth is defined as all assets net out all debts. In the top quartile of the household net wealth distribution held the lion�s share�87 percent (or $43.6 trillion) while the bottom quartile of households had nothing. The upper and lower middle quartiles combined held $6.5 trillion, or 13 percent of total household net wealth (see Chart 1).

http://www.interfaith.org/forum/members/citizenzen-albums-album-picture1305-screen-shot-2011-04-16.png


As he says in the report, "In other words, the bottom 28 million of American households in 2004 had nothing once their debt is netted out ..."

The difference between inequalities in wealth and income is quite natural, as one is from a stock perspective and the other is from a flow perspective. Low income households have to spend most or all of their incomes on life necessities with little capability of saving and investment so they can hardly accumulate any household net wealth. Thus they often remain in the bottom distribution of household wealth with nothing; the exception is the group of low income senior households who recently fell into the low-income category due to retirement and the loss of income. In short, while the bottom quartile of income distribution still has income, the bottom quartile of wealth distribution does not have any wealth net of debt.

---

flir67

Nov 26, 11:51 AM

the success of this tablet will really depend on its design. if its like the pc's ones that are ultra thin with no media drive and the swivel screen it might make it. but if its just a flat panel square single sided tablet then it will fail..

it sounds like a macbook replacement. thinner and lighter same price.

history will always repeat itself sometime.

---

ucfgrad93

May 5, 11:31 AM

BTW, searching a room disarms traps, so we should get to a point where our last move is search instead of move, if I understand the rules.

Agreed.

---